- From: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 11:44:43 -0600
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Jan Hellbusch [2bweb.de]" <hellbusch@2bweb.de>, WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+=z1WkA6tP2x6qhjCfzGrh9ngVL-qv56DOHe5Jpmdo2maP0LA@mail.gmail.com>
have seen several websites recently using just a checkbox as a toggle. here is one http://maximus.knowbility.org.php56-11.dfw3-2.websitetestlink.com/ seems it would be easier for users to check a box to activate something and uncheck to deactivate. and easier for devs to not have to write js or css or whatever to have button text toggle etc between "activate something" deactivate something. would be interesting to have some usability testing on this. On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 21 November 2016 at 14:02, Jan Hellbusch [2bweb.de] <hellbusch@2bweb.de > > wrote: > >> There seems to be a slight inconsistency between the current HTML spec and >> the ARIA in HTML overview >> > > HTML normatively points to ARIA in HTML, so in case of any inconsistency > refer to ARIA in HTML > > Authors may use the ARIA role and aria-* attributes on HTML elements >> <https://www.w3.org/TR/html51/infrastructure.html#html-element>, in >> accordance with the requirements described in the ARIA specifications, >> except where these conflict with the requirements specified in ARIA in HTML >> [html-aria] >> <https://www.w3.org/TR/html51/references.html#biblio-html-aria>. >> > > https://www.w3.org/TR/html51/dom.html#aria-authoring-requirements > > > -- > > Regards > > SteveF > Current Standards Work @W3C > <http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/> > -- Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756 voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9264 http://www.tsbvi.edu/ "We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2016 17:45:17 UTC