- From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:19:21 +0000
- To: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <64B17BFD-CAE9-4413-8EE5-0D33CBDAA879@adobe.com>
BCC’ing the Interest Group list as this is a question to the WCAG group. I don’t believe that there was any confusion about feedback in the proposal. Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com http://twitter.com/awkawk From: "lisa.seeman@zoho.com<mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com>" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com<mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com>> Date: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 at 23:15 To: WAI-IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>> Subject: feedback loops Resent-From: WAI-IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 at 23:15 Hi I was reading the minuets for this weeks call relating to feedback SC https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/rapid-and-direct-feedback.html We had discussed on the coga list Joshes suggestion to use the term feedback loops but we had found it very confusing, as in the engineering world a feedback loop is something very different to giving the user feedback about whether a task was completed successfully. Did WCAG think we were referring to engineering feedback loops or did the group understand that we meant letting the user know if a task was completed successfully? The minuets could be read either way. All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2016 12:20:16 UTC