- From: Rakesh <prakesh369@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 20:29:58 +0530
- To: Mandana Eibegger <mandana@schoener.at>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hello Mandana, Though I personally recommend having Skip link, it is sufficient to have any one of the following. 1. Skip link. 2. Proper heading structure. 3. Proper ARIA landmarks. Yes, I feel HTML 5 elements such as main, aside, nav serve the same purpose. Just ensure that these HTML 5 elements work as expected on all targeted browsers. I think worth looking at the following article http://www.maxability.co.in/2013/02/bypass-blocks/ Thanks & Regards Rakesh On 7/8/15, Mandana Eibegger <mandana@schoener.at> wrote: > Hello, > > i have a question concerning the Success Criterion 2.4.1 "Bypass Blocks". > > For this SC there is the Sufficient Technique > "ARIA11: Using ARIA landmarks to identify regions of a page (ARIA)" > > And an Advisory Technique > "Using accessibility supported technologies which allow structured > navigation by user agents and assistive technologies (future link) " > > Does HTML5 count as an "accessibility supported technology" in the > meantime? > So, would using <main><header> etc be sufficient to support bypassing of > blocks? > > And what about users, not using AT (just tabbing in the browser)? > Wouldn't it still be necessary to implement skip-links and access-keys > to make a webpage accessible? > > Thank you, > Mandana > > -- Best Regards Rakesh Paladugula www.maxability.co.in
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2015 15:00:27 UTC