- From: <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 15:01:05 +0300
- To: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hi, There are discussions in a lot of places about changing the little padlock icons and so on that provide some feedback about whether a page is secure. I am wondering how much of the world doesn't have access to that anyway, making it more or less irrelelvant. Examples of problems I can imagine: - padlocks that only vary in colour, - icons that are not announced to screenreaders, - extensions with notification mechanisms that are not visible when people are using magnification - malware warnings that are incomprehensible - malware warnings that do not allow users to proceed when they clearly identify a false positive (this does happen from time to time) But there is a difference between problems that could arise and problems that do. I'd love to find someone has collected a bunch of this - failing which, would people be prepared to contribute examples to a wiki page, that we could then use to help implementors see where they stand, what they need to fix, and where the standards are lacking in support? cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2015 12:01:35 UTC