- From: Wayne Dick <waynedick@knowbility.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 22:20:46 -0400
- To: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>, WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
- Message-ID: <CAC9gL74=_1YeUJck8_0UXTDdH9O3k06abBE=0QSj3TseLogXqw@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Phill, First, I am sorry that my first response was so crabby. All I want is the ability to use the whole screen to enlarge text and reformat it. For me this works best for reading and composition. I have found empirically that other typographic transformations also help a lot. For doing this the mainstream browser is the best tool I ever encountered. Unlike most people I can create a usable environment for myself, so I know the power of reading with a customized format. Many word processors are also flexible enough to do the job. Vicki Hanson really started this approach. *Use the user agent to adapt to user needs*. She was too early. The platforms of the day could not sustain her work. Today we have the stable technology to create relatively portable browser extensions that can channel the user agent's power to support print disabilities. To do this we need the access to customize. We need content with style that can be accessed. The structural conditions I have identified are necessary conditions for content to permit customization. I am not sure they are sufficient, but I think with the rest of WCAG 2.0 they are. I am a person with central retina damage and moderate low vision (20/60-20/200). My accommodation may not work for hazy or blurry vision, peripheral retina damage or extreme light sensitivity. It may not work for severe low vision (20/200-20/400) or profound low vision (20/400-20/1000). There are visual readers in all of these categories. Crossing condition with severity you see that we have about 12 groups of users each of which may need a different range of accommodation. I have tried screen magnification. It does not work for me. That may not be true for someone in one of the other groups or even someone like me. They may need other visual customizations. We need access to the presentation and the power of the user agent to display our presentations just as cleanly as they display the complex visual designs of sites for normal users. That is what I am proposing. It is possible. All you on the Access Board have your work cut out. Wayne
Received on Friday, 29 May 2015 02:21:15 UTC