- From: <accessys@smart.net>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:55:24 -0400 (EDT)
- To: (unknown charset) Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net>
- cc: (unknown charset) Judy Okite <judyokite@gmail.com>, Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com>, Mark Sadecki <mark@sadecki.com>, WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.1408141754290.14082@cygnus.smart.net>
actually with a "little" work I found <!....TADA.....> ;PPPPPPPP Bob On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Karen Lewellen wrote: > Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:42:03 -0400 (EDT) > From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> > To: Judy Okite <judyokite@gmail.com> > Cc: Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com>, > Mark Sadecki <mark@sadecki.com>, WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > Subject: Re: For you: A webpage that is 100% accessible to all people around > the world, > regardless of nationality or disability or Assistive Technology > Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 21:42:27 +0000 > Resent-From: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > > is one intended to reach a blank page? I got 100% of nothing. > BTW, is it your contention that all people who share a label given to them by > those external to themselves are 100% the same? > Even science tells you that there are no absolutes. > no access here either. > Karen > > On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Judy Okite wrote: > >> the website is not opening on my end, please... >> >> Kind Regards, >> >> *'Chance Favors the prepared mind'* - Louis Pasteur >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Bryan Garaventa < >> bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com> wrote: >> >>> Ah, woops… >>> >>> You are welcome to add that one in J >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* mark.sadecki@gmail.com [mailto:mark.sadecki@gmail.com] *On >>> Behalf >>> Of *Mark Sadecki >>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 14, 2014 1:18 PM >>> *To:* Bryan Garaventa >>> *Cc:* w3c-wai-ig@w3.org >>> *Subject:* Re: For you: A webpage that is 100% accessible to all people >>> around the world, regardless of nationality or disability or Assistive >>> Technology >>> >>> >>> >>> Bryan, >>> >>> >>> >>> This can’t be right. At no point have you even considered the >>> reradicating, octally repeating, sesquidecimated equinox factor. Once >>> considered, the accessibility percentage should round nicely to 97.82. >>> >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Bryan Garaventa < >>> bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com> wrote: >>> >>> Recently, somebody asked me to show them a website that was 100% >>> accessible, so I figured it would make a good experiment. Sort of a >>> thought >>> experiment I guess... >>> >>> >>> >>> So I built a webpage that is 100% accessible to all people in the world >>> equally, regardless of nationality, disability type, or Assistive >>> Technology used. >>> >>> >>> >>> Enjoy! It's available at >>> >>> http://whatsock.com/test/100_percent_accessible.htm >>> >>> Happy testing. >>> >>> >>> >>> With this 100% accessible baseline to start from, the accessibility >>> percentage for all web technologies everywhere, scales downward to >>> account >>> for requisite variables, so that no web technology anywhere can be 100% >>> accessible as a result. >>> >>> >>> >>> To demonstrate this, I also wrote the following algorithm, that >>> calculates >>> the general percentage of accessibility for any given web technology. >>> >>> >>> >>> X = (1 * Disability-Type * Browser-AT * Site-Interactivity * >>> Site-Complexity * User-Experience) >>> >>> P = (Hardware * ((((1 * OS-AT) - X) * Accessibility-Level) + X)) * 100 >>> >>> >>> >>> P is the general Percentage of accessibility calculated for a particular >>> website or web technology feature, which is based on the following >>> estimated values for each variable in the formula. >>> >>> >>> >>> Disability-Type >>> >>> 0.01: Deaf-Blind + Motor-Impaired >>> >>> 0.1: Deaf-Blind >>> >>> 0.2: Deaf + Motor-Impaired >>> >>> 0.3: Blind + Motor-Impaired >>> >>> 0.4: Partially Sighted + Motor-Impaired >>> >>> 0.5: Motor-Impaired >>> >>> 0.6: Blind >>> >>> 0.7: Deaf + Partially Sighted >>> >>> 0.8: Partially Sighted >>> >>> 0.9: Deaf >>> >>> >>> >>> Browser-AT >>> >>> 1: No AT >>> >>> 0.98: Internet Explorer + JAWS >>> >>> 0.93: Internet Explorer + NVDA >>> >>> 0.95: Firefox + JAWS >>> >>> 0.98: Firefox + NVDA >>> >>> 0.95: Safari + VoiceOver >>> >>> 0.6: Chrome + JAWS >>> >>> 0.7: Chrome + NVDA >>> >>> 0.95: Internet Explorer or Firefox or Chrome + Dragon >>> >>> 0.98: Internet Explorer or Firefox or Chrome + ZoomText >>> >>> 0.9: Internet Explorer or Firefox or Chrome or Safari + Braille Display >>> >>> >>> >>> Site-Interactivity >>> >>> 1: Contains All Static Elements >>> >>> 0.9: Contains Interactive Features >>> >>> >>> >>> Site-Complexity >>> >>> 1: Simple >>> >>> 0.95: Medium >>> >>> 0.9: Complex >>> >>> >>> >>> User-Experience >>> >>> 1: Advanced >>> >>> 0.95: Intermediate >>> >>> 0.9: Beginner >>> >>> >>> >>> Hardware >>> >>> 0: None >>> >>> 1: Computer >>> >>> >>> >>> OS-AT >>> >>> 0.001: No AT >>> >>> 0.99: Windows + JAWS >>> >>> 0.99: Windows + NVDA >>> >>> 0.99: Windows + Dragon >>> >>> 0.99: Windows + ZoomText >>> >>> 0.99: iOS + VoiceOver >>> >>> 0.99: OS X + VoiceOver >>> >>> 0.9: Windows or iOS or OS X + Braille Display >>> >>> >>> >>> Accessibility-Level >>> >>> 0.98: Fully Keyboard Accessible + ARIA Standards Compliant (when >>> applicable) + WCAG Compliant >>> >>> 0.3: Fully Keyboard Accessible + ARIA Standards Compliant (when >>> applicable) but not WCAG Compliant >>> >>> 0.3: Fully Keyboard Accessible but not ARIA Standards Compliant (when >>> applicable) + WCAG Compliant >>> >>> 0.2: Fully Keyboard Accessible but not ARIA Standards Compliant (when >>> applicable) nor WCAG Compliant >>> >>> 0.1: ARIA Standards Compliant (when applicable) but not Fully Keyboard >>> Accessible nor WCAG Compliant >>> >>> 0.01: Neither Fully Keyboard Accessible nor ARIA Standards Compliant >>> (when >>> applicable) nor WCAG Compliant >>> >>> >>> >>> (More constants can always be added or adjusted) >>> >>> >>> >>> For example: >>> >>> >>> >>> (1 * .6 * .95 * .9 * .9 * .9) = 0.41553 >>> >>> (1 * ((((1 * 0.99) - 0.41553) * .98) + 0.41553)) * 100 = 97.85106 >>> >>> >>> >>> So roughly calculated, a Blind person(.6) using Safari+VoiceOver(.95) >>> accessing a website that Contains Interactive Features(.9) that is >>> Complex(.9) when the user is a Beginner(.9), >>> >>> in combination with Hardware(1) that includes iOS+VoiceOver(.99), upon a >>> website that is >>> >>> Fully Keyboard Accessible + ARIA Standards Compliant (when applicable) + >>> WCAG Compliant(.98), will have a general accessibility Percentage of >>> 97.8. >>> >>> >>> >>> Like I said, these are just estimates, but I thought it would make an >>> interesting experiment. >>> >>> >>> >>> Best wishes, >>> >>> Bryan >>> >>> >>> >
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2014 22:17:09 UTC