- From: <accessys@smart.net>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:41:49 -0400 (EDT)
- To: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net
- cc: Katherine Mancuso <kmancuso@gmail.com>, Judy Okite <judyokite@gmail.com>, Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com>, Mark Sadecki <mark@sadecki.com>, WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
did so in another e-mail I guess was gotten Bob On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 deborah.kaplan@suberic.net wrote: > Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:34:56 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) > From: deborah.kaplan@suberic.net > To: accessys@smart.net > Cc: Katherine Mancuso <kmancuso@gmail.com>, Judy Okite <judyokite@gmail.com>, > Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com>, > Mark Sadecki <mark@sadecki.com>, WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > Subject: Re: For you: A webpage that is 100% accessible to all people around > the world, regardless of nationality or disability or Assistive Technology > Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 21:35:42 +0000 > Resent-From: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > > The page is basically a joke, playing on the idea that there is no such thing > as a 100% accessible page; it's blank, with empty HTML source. Given how many > people in the community are viewing on mobile -- or are using screen readers > and are used to theoretically accessible pages that report nothing back to > them -- it's worth being more explicit about why you can't access the page. > :) > > Deborah Kaplan > > > On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, accessys@smart.net wrote: > >> >> apparently only if using windows >> >> Bob >> >> >> On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Katherine Mancuso wrote: >> >>> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 14:06:06 -0700 >>> From: Katherine Mancuso <kmancuso@gmail.com> >>> To: Judy Okite <judyokite@gmail.com> >>> Cc: Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com>, >>> Mark Sadecki <mark@sadecki.com>, WAI Interest Group >>> <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> >>> Subject: Re: For you: A webpage that is 100% accessible to all people >>> around the world, regardless of nationality or disability or >>> Assistive Technology >>> Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 21:06:54 +0000 >>> Resent-From: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org >>> >>> Functioning as expected. You'll want to "view source" of the page you >>> get. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Judy Okite <judyokite@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> the website is not opening on my end, please... >>>> >>>> Kind Regards, >>>> >>>> *'Chance Favors the prepared mind'* - Louis Pasteur >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Bryan Garaventa < >>>> bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ah, woops??? >>>>> >>>>> You are welcome to add that one in J >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* mark.sadecki@gmail.com [mailto:mark.sadecki@gmail.com] *On >>>>> Behalf Of *Mark Sadecki >>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 14, 2014 1:18 PM >>>>> *To:* Bryan Garaventa >>>>> *Cc:* w3c-wai-ig@w3.org >>>>> *Subject:* Re: For you: A webpage that is 100% accessible to all >>>>> people >>>>> around the world, regardless of nationality or disability or >>>>> Assistive >>>>> Technology >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bryan, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This can???t be right. At no point have you even considered the >>>>> reradicating, octally repeating, sesquidecimated equinox factor. >>>>> Once >>>>> considered, the accessibility percentage should round nicely to >>>>> 97.82. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Mark >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Bryan Garaventa < >>>>> bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Recently, somebody asked me to show them a website that was 100% >>>>> accessible, so I figured it would make a good experiment. Sort of a >>>>> thought >>>>> experiment I guess... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So I built a webpage that is 100% accessible to all people in the >>>>> world >>>>> equally, regardless of nationality, disability type, or Assistive >>>>> Technology used. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Enjoy! It's available at >>>>> >>>>> http://whatsock.com/test/100_percent_accessible.htm >>>>> >>>>> Happy testing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> With this 100% accessible baseline to start from, the accessibility >>>>> percentage for all web technologies everywhere, scales downward to >>>>> account >>>>> for requisite variables, so that no web technology anywhere can be >>>>> 100% >>>>> accessible as a result. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> To demonstrate this, I also wrote the following algorithm, that >>>>> calculates the general percentage of accessibility for any given web >>>>> technology. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> X = (1 * Disability-Type * Browser-AT * Site-Interactivity * >>>>> Site-Complexity * User-Experience) >>>>> >>>>> P = (Hardware * ((((1 * OS-AT) - X) * Accessibility-Level) + X)) * >>>>> 100 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> P is the general Percentage of accessibility calculated for a >>>>> particular >>>>> website or web technology feature, which is based on the following >>>>> estimated values for each variable in the formula. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Disability-Type >>>>> >>>>> 0.01: Deaf-Blind + Motor-Impaired >>>>> >>>>> 0.1: Deaf-Blind >>>>> >>>>> 0.2: Deaf + Motor-Impaired >>>>> >>>>> 0.3: Blind + Motor-Impaired >>>>> >>>>> 0.4: Partially Sighted + Motor-Impaired >>>>> >>>>> 0.5: Motor-Impaired >>>>> >>>>> 0.6: Blind >>>>> >>>>> 0.7: Deaf + Partially Sighted >>>>> >>>>> 0.8: Partially Sighted >>>>> >>>>> 0.9: Deaf >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Browser-AT >>>>> >>>>> 1: No AT >>>>> >>>>> 0.98: Internet Explorer + JAWS >>>>> >>>>> 0.93: Internet Explorer + NVDA >>>>> >>>>> 0.95: Firefox + JAWS >>>>> >>>>> 0.98: Firefox + NVDA >>>>> >>>>> 0.95: Safari + VoiceOver >>>>> >>>>> 0.6: Chrome + JAWS >>>>> >>>>> 0.7: Chrome + NVDA >>>>> >>>>> 0.95: Internet Explorer or Firefox or Chrome + Dragon >>>>> >>>>> 0.98: Internet Explorer or Firefox or Chrome + ZoomText >>>>> >>>>> 0.9: Internet Explorer or Firefox or Chrome or Safari + Braille >>>>> Display >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Site-Interactivity >>>>> >>>>> 1: Contains All Static Elements >>>>> >>>>> 0.9: Contains Interactive Features >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Site-Complexity >>>>> >>>>> 1: Simple >>>>> >>>>> 0.95: Medium >>>>> >>>>> 0.9: Complex >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> User-Experience >>>>> >>>>> 1: Advanced >>>>> >>>>> 0.95: Intermediate >>>>> >>>>> 0.9: Beginner >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hardware >>>>> >>>>> 0: None >>>>> >>>>> 1: Computer >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> OS-AT >>>>> >>>>> 0.001: No AT >>>>> >>>>> 0.99: Windows + JAWS >>>>> >>>>> 0.99: Windows + NVDA >>>>> >>>>> 0.99: Windows + Dragon >>>>> >>>>> 0.99: Windows + ZoomText >>>>> >>>>> 0.99: iOS + VoiceOver >>>>> >>>>> 0.99: OS X + VoiceOver >>>>> >>>>> 0.9: Windows or iOS or OS X + Braille Display >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Accessibility-Level >>>>> >>>>> 0.98: Fully Keyboard Accessible + ARIA Standards Compliant (when >>>>> applicable) + WCAG Compliant >>>>> >>>>> 0.3: Fully Keyboard Accessible + ARIA Standards Compliant (when >>>>> applicable) but not WCAG Compliant >>>>> >>>>> 0.3: Fully Keyboard Accessible but not ARIA Standards Compliant >>>>> (when >>>>> applicable) + WCAG Compliant >>>>> >>>>> 0.2: Fully Keyboard Accessible but not ARIA Standards Compliant >>>>> (when >>>>> applicable) nor WCAG Compliant >>>>> >>>>> 0.1: ARIA Standards Compliant (when applicable) but not Fully >>>>> Keyboard >>>>> Accessible nor WCAG Compliant >>>>> >>>>> 0.01: Neither Fully Keyboard Accessible nor ARIA Standards Compliant >>>>> (when applicable) nor WCAG Compliant >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> (More constants can always be added or adjusted) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> For example: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> (1 * .6 * .95 * .9 * .9 * .9) = 0.41553 >>>>> >>>>> (1 * ((((1 * 0.99) - 0.41553) * .98) + 0.41553)) * 100 = 97.85106 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So roughly calculated, a Blind person(.6) using >>>>> Safari+VoiceOver(.95) >>>>> accessing a website that Contains Interactive Features(.9) that is >>>>> Complex(.9) when the user is a Beginner(.9), >>>>> >>>>> in combination with Hardware(1) that includes iOS+VoiceOver(.99), >>>>> upon a >>>>> website that is >>>>> >>>>> Fully Keyboard Accessible + ARIA Standards Compliant (when >>>>> applicable) + >>>>> WCAG Compliant(.98), will have a general accessibility Percentage of >>>>> 97.8. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Like I said, these are just estimates, but I thought it would make >>>>> an >>>>> interesting experiment. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best wishes, >>>>> >>>>> Bryan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >> > > -- >
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2014 21:52:17 UTC