Re: quick wacg 2.0 question?

On 15/06/14 18:12, Karen Lewellen wrote:

> I have several posts over the time I have been here pointing out that
> true wacg 2.0 guidelines specify that a site should be browser

I presume you mean WCAG.

> agnostic.  Can anyone direct me to the specific rule where this language
> is used?

The actual wording is probably not used in current standards, but it is 
fairly clearly implied by <> 
although the detailed rules are not sufficient to fully achieve the 
headline goal.

Received on Sunday, 15 June 2014 23:44:04 UTC