- From: Wayne Dick <waynedick@knowbility.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 14:52:18 -0700
- CC: info@accessibilityassociation.org, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, webaim-forum@list.webaim.org
- Message-ID: <536D4E12.5090408@knowbility.org>
I am wondering why we havecorporate memberships at all. It appears like a conflict of interest. If an organization really represents accessibility professionals then the professionals should support it individually. Microsoft having one individual membership, pay one individual dues, and getting one vote. Also, as manyemployees of Microsoft can join as want to join, but the represent themselves, but Microsoft should not pay their dues or give them released time to work for the association. Sorry, Microsoft, you are just an exemplar, I could have used Apple or Freedom Scientific. Most accessibility professionals are IT people which means our mean salary is pretty good. It is certainly good enough to support an organization well, and we could do it without corporate sponsorship. Who can trust an organization when it says a corporate sponsor develops an accessible product? Quite simply, nobody really trusts this type of certification. Even if members of a sustaining company recuse themselves from decisions regarding their product lines, the unspoken threat of removal of support suffices to keep the non-profit organization in line. I have stayed away from IAAP discussions because of this organizational deficit. It is possible to be financially independent and support an organization with high standards. IAAP ought to try. Wayne
Received on Friday, 9 May 2014 21:52:48 UTC