W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Technique H25 / real life

From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:02:11 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+ri+V=qbjryUUyTEfHvH8kOmd6tPuBZfMLTKxMZ07zGa_ZHqQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Cc: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hi Pat,

I am suggesting that it fails 4.1.1 and is therefore a fail of a normative
requirement, nothing more.

--

Regards

SteveF
HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>


On 30 October 2013 18:44, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote:

> On 30/10/2013 18:32, Steve Faulkner wrote:> My thoughts,
>
> > <title> in body is a parsing error and therefore  fails wcag 2 4.1.1
> > Parsing.  Seems**we should not allow stuff that fails a normative
> > requirement*
>
> But "2.4.2 Page Titled" and "4.1.1 Parsing" are separate SCs, so a page
> that has <title> in <body> should pass 2.4.2, but fail 4.1.1, no?
>
> Or are you suggesting that regardless, 4.1.1. automatically makes it a
> fail for 2.4.2. as well?
>
>
> P
> -- Patrick H. Lauke
> ______________________________**______________________________**__
> re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
> [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
> http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/**redux/<http://flickr.com/photos/redux/>
> ______________________________**______________________________**__
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
> ______________________________**______________________________**__
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 20:03:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:50 UTC