- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:02:11 +0000
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Cc: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 20:03:20 UTC
Hi Pat, I am suggesting that it fails 4.1.1 and is therefore a fail of a normative requirement, nothing more. -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> On 30 October 2013 18:44, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > On 30/10/2013 18:32, Steve Faulkner wrote:> My thoughts, > > > <title> in body is a parsing error and therefore fails wcag 2 4.1.1 > > Parsing. Seems**we should not allow stuff that fails a normative > > requirement* > > But "2.4.2 Page Titled" and "4.1.1 Parsing" are separate SCs, so a page > that has <title> in <body> should pass 2.4.2, but fail 4.1.1, no? > > Or are you suggesting that regardless, 4.1.1. automatically makes it a > fail for 2.4.2. as well? > > > P > -- Patrick H. Lauke > ______________________________**______________________________**__ > re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively > [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] > > www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk > http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/**redux/<http://flickr.com/photos/redux/> > ______________________________**______________________________**__ > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > ______________________________**______________________________**__ > >
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 20:03:20 UTC