W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: <i>, <em> and font-style:italic in HTML 5

From: Ramón Corominas <listas@ramoncorominas.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 23:15:29 +0200
Message-ID: <524F2FF1.7080102@ramoncorominas.com>
To: davebest@cogeco.ca
CC: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Just a clarification... I'm not saying that these features shouldn't be 
used, what I'm saying is that they must be used properly.

In fact, they are the right way to mark up semantics in HTML documents, 
but I think it is good to know how most screen readers manage these 

Of course, screen reader users can enable different pronunciation for 
these tags (it is curious that they usually use a lower voice), and this 
changes can be very important under certain situations.

However, marking a lot of <strong> or <em> can lead to more confusion or 
interference, instead of conveying valuable information. And this is 
something that affects everyone, not only screen reader users. If a 
paragraph has a lot of words marked with <strong>, it is not conveying 
what is important and what is not.


David wrote:

> For the most part these text display options are not used by screen reader users, but that does not mean these indicators should not be used. Depending upon the screen reader user agent, it is possible to set these options for speech and for braille output. A blind user in a professional environment quite often needs to know, just as the sighted user, the change in text colour and highlighting. In this case the screen reader user will create multiple speech themes, and switch between them as needed. Just because most screen reader users do not depend upon the text display changes, does not mean that it is not used and not needed. Without this ability you are limiting the career development of blind professionals.
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 21:15:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:36:46 UTC