- From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 20:53:40 -0400
- To: "Frank M. Palinkas" <fmpalinkas@gmail.com>, David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Cc: "Mattingly, F Darrell" <darrell.mattingly@uky.edu>, WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, "Guettler, Karen M" <kmguet2@uky.edu>
- Message-ID: <8a7cd0b0955dcfa4007a61f754be96bc@mail.gmail.com>
[Frank wrote] FYG about @longdesc: I posted to the WCAG HTML Accessibility Taskforce list my thoughts on this – I’ll briefly restate them here. With the current proposal and previous requirements user agents were not and still are not required to expose longdesc to users or required to make it keyboard accessible. It’s indicated that “user agents” should make them keyboard accessible. This perpetuates the idea that alternatives are only needed for users who cannot see images or have images turned off. This denies people with low vision who are not using AT but like to see images and people with cognitive disabilities access to the longer description. This practice is one-size-fits one and isn’t universal design. Users with low vision may be able to see and decipher 8 out of 10 images but there may be a few that they need the alternative text or longdesc to understand and use. The HTML specification in fact indicates that alt shall NOT be display when images are displayed as it acts a replacement for images. So it’s not surprising the longdesc would follow down this same path as alt. I have no problem with programmatically associating long description or long description links with an image but it MUST be available to all user groups without having to install special plug-ins or run assistive technology to access or make user agents display information that others can access without such requirements. Jonathan *From:* Frank M. Palinkas [mailto:fmpalinkas@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, March 28, 2013 7:38 PM *To:* David Woolley *Cc:* Mattingly, F Darrell; WAI Interest Group; Guettler, Karen M *Subject:* Re: alt tags for graphs FYG about @longdesc: //////////////////////////////////////////// *Shawn Henry* <shawn@w3.org> Mar 12 ** ** to WAI, Steven, Charles, Janina, Paul, rubys, mjs, Judy, Michael, Philippe, Michael(tm), www-archive, Robin Dear WAI Interest Group Participants, The W3C HTML Working Group today published the First Public Working Draft of: HTML Image Description Extension http://www.w3.org/TR/html-longdesc This specification ("HTML-longdesc") enables web authors to provide longer text descriptions for complex images. It defines the "longdesc" attribute to link descriptions with images in HTML5 content. HTML-longdesc is an extension specification that is part of the HTML5 family of specifications [1], which enables it to evolve independently and be finalized more rapidly. HTML-longdesc is part of W3C's work to ensure that the Open Web Platform [2] is accessible to people with disabilities [3]. Based on this publication, the following changes will be implemented in the coming weeks: * W3C validator [4] will validate longdesc as conforming HTML5. * longdesc will be removed from the HTML obsolete features list. Comments: Please send any comments on this Draft to the publicly archived HTML Accessibility Task Force mailing list: public-html-a11y@w3.org by 10 April 2013 Working Groups: HTML-longdesc was developed by the HTML Accessibility Task Force under the WAI Protocols and Formats Working Group (PFWG) and the HTML Working Group (HTML WG). [5] About the URI: The first URI above goes to the latest version of the specification. The "dated" version of this Working Draft is: < http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-html-longdesc-20130312/> The difference between these URIs are explained in Referencing and Linking to WAI Guidelines and Technical Documents at: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/linking> Please let us know if you have any questions. Thank you in advance for your comments. Feel free to circulate this message to other lists; please avoid cross-postings where possible. Regards, ~Shawn Henry, WAI Outreach HTML Accessibility Task Force Co-Facilitators: Steve Faulkner, Charles McCathie-Neville, Janina Sajka HTML WG Chairs: Paul Cotton, Sam Ruby, Maciej Stachowiak PFWG Chair: Janina Sajka W3C Staff: Judy Brewer, Michael Cooper, Philippe Le Hégaret, Michael Smith //////////////////////////////////////// Kind regards, Frank M. Palinkas Senior Technical Writer Quixey, Inc., Mountain View, California Mobile: +1 650 248 5315 Web Accessibility and Standards tutorials: http://dev.opera.com/author/947856 On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:00 PM, David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk> wrote: Mattingly, F Darrell wrote: I’m working on a project to teach mathematical concepts. What is the best manner to describe graphs, such as the one below Mathematics is about being precise. There is no such thing as an alt tag in HTML. I think you mean an alt attribute. I don't think it is possible to answer the question without knowing the educational point that is being made in the particular case, however, I suspect what you really needed was longdesc, except that it was never usefully supported by mainstream browsers and may well have been removed. Without longdesc, I think, as a minimum, you will need to include a link to a textual description in the main text. alt, in this case, can really only convey enough for someone already familiar with the concepts to know what the intention of the diagram is. I don't think it can cover enough for someone who is expected to learn those concepts. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Friday, 29 March 2013 00:56:06 UTC