- From: Frank M. Palinkas <fmpalinkas@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:37:55 -0700
- To: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Cc: "Mattingly, F Darrell" <darrell.mattingly@uky.edu>, WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, "Guettler, Karen M" <kmguet2@uky.edu>
- Message-ID: <CAN6dTQUSzyXYJrQz-r3D93QcCzDCQcsO8Wd7OKKBi1vJcozRkA@mail.gmail.com>
FYG about @longdesc: //////////////////////////////////////////// Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> Mar 12 to WAI, Steven, Charles, Janina, Paul, rubys, mjs, Judy, Michael, Philippe, Michael(tm), www-archive, Robin Dear WAI Interest Group Participants, The W3C HTML Working Group today published the First Public Working Draft of: HTML Image Description Extension http://www.w3.org/TR/html-**longdesc<http://www.w3.org/TR/html-longdesc> This specification ("HTML-longdesc") enables web authors to provide longer text descriptions for complex images. It defines the "longdesc" attribute to link descriptions with images in HTML5 content. HTML-longdesc is an extension specification that is part of the HTML5 family of specifications [1], which enables it to evolve independently and be finalized more rapidly. HTML-longdesc is part of W3C's work to ensure that the Open Web Platform [2] is accessible to people with disabilities [3]. Based on this publication, the following changes will be implemented in the coming weeks: * W3C validator [4] will validate longdesc as conforming HTML5. * longdesc will be removed from the HTML obsolete features list. Comments: Please send any comments on this Draft to the publicly archived HTML Accessibility Task Force mailing list: public-html-a11y@w3.org by 10 April 2013 Working Groups: HTML-longdesc was developed by the HTML Accessibility Task Force under the WAI Protocols and Formats Working Group (PFWG) and the HTML Working Group (HTML WG). [5] About the URI: The first URI above goes to the latest version of the specification. The "dated" version of this Working Draft is: < http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-**html-longdesc-20130312/<http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-html-longdesc-20130312/>> The difference between these URIs are explained in Referencing and Linking to WAI Guidelines and Technical Documents at: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/* *linking <http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/linking>> Please let us know if you have any questions. Thank you in advance for your comments. Feel free to circulate this message to other lists; please avoid cross-postings where possible. Regards, ~Shawn Henry, WAI Outreach HTML Accessibility Task Force Co-Facilitators: Steve Faulkner, Charles McCathie-Neville, Janina Sajka HTML WG Chairs: Paul Cotton, Sam Ruby, Maciej Stachowiak PFWG Chair: Janina Sajka W3C Staff: Judy Brewer, Michael Cooper, Philippe Le Hégaret, Michael Smith //////////////////////////////////////// Kind regards, Frank M. Palinkas Senior Technical Writer Quixey, Inc., Mountain View, California Mobile: +1 650 248 5315 Web Accessibility and Standards tutorials: http://dev.opera.com/author/947856 On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:00 PM, David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>wrote: > Mattingly, F Darrell wrote: > >> >> I’m working on a project to teach mathematical concepts. What is the >> best manner to describe graphs, such as the one below >> > > Mathematics is about being precise. There is no such thing as an alt tag > in HTML. I think you mean an alt attribute. > > I don't think it is possible to answer the question without knowing the > educational point that is being made in the particular case, however, I > suspect what you really needed was longdesc, except that it was never > usefully supported by mainstream browsers and may well have been removed. > > Without longdesc, I think, as a minimum, you will need to include a link > to a textual description in the main text. > > alt, in this case, can really only convey enough for someone already > familiar with the concepts to know what the intention of the diagram is. I > don't think it can cover enough for someone who is expected to learn those > concepts. > -- > David Woolley > Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. > RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, > that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work. > > >
Received on Thursday, 28 March 2013 23:39:04 UTC