- From: Ian Yang <ian@invigoreight.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 20:52:50 +0800
- To: Userite <richard@userite.com>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Userite <richard@userite.com> wrote: > > Dear Ian, > > A search result is a list of relevant links "TO ARTICLES". > > These list items may include images and summaries - but they are NOT the > articles, they are links to the articles. > > When applying semantic structure you need to think about the purpose of each > part of the page and the elements within it. The purpose of (most) search > results is to offer the user links to what the engine's algorithms think are > the most relevant pieces of information (articles). Extra information, such > as abstracts or images, can be provided to help the user make the final > choice. If you use the <article> element in the results list you confuse > your users into thinking that the list contains the full articles and that > this is all the information they need. > > Regards > Richard > Thanks Richard for your advises. But isn't <article> qualified for both full articles and non-full articles (such as independent content)? And given that we don't use <article>s, it won't change the fact that the content of each search result can be complicated. How would you estimate the the accessibility? Kind Regards, Ian
Received on Sunday, 26 May 2013 12:53:22 UTC