Re: Current suggestion for subheading isn't accessible

Steve Faulkner wrote:

> I would rather work on constructive stuff that is of tangible benefit:
>
> for example getting the accessibility implementations of the new HTML5
> interactive controls completed....
>

That sounds to me like a perfectly good idea...

and, as an afterthought: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!!"


Kind regards, Harry



On 8 May 2013 11:05, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would rather work on constructive stuff that is of tangible benefit:
>
> for example getting the accessibility implementations of the new HTML5
> interactive controls completed....
>
> --
>
> Regards
>
> SteveF
> HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
>
>
> On 8 May 2013 09:59, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 08/05/2013 09:58, Steve Faulkner wrote:
>>
>>>     Although I don't want to get too philosophical here...what *is* a
>>>     subheading, exactly? Is there any unambiguous definition?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> that's part of the issue I also think we are twisting ourselves in knots
>>> over an issue that is frankly less important than many of the other
>>> accessibility issues we could spend time working on.
>>>
>>
>> Let's go back to arguing over longdesc then :p
>>
>>
>> P
>> --
>> Patrick H. Lauke
>> ______________________________**______________________________**__
>> re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
>> [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
>>
>> www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
>> http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/**redux/<http://flickr.com/photos/redux/>
>> ______________________________**______________________________**__
>> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>> ______________________________**______________________________**__
>>
>>
>