- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 10:05:52 +0100
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Cc: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+VkEFndj+0X1yawAZm9e4NHuXsfYpvmHh3eEedFjSrv9GQ@mail.gmail.com>
I would rather work on constructive stuff that is of tangible benefit: for example getting the accessibility implementations of the new HTML5 interactive controls completed.... -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> On 8 May 2013 09:59, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > On 08/05/2013 09:58, Steve Faulkner wrote: > >> Although I don't want to get too philosophical here...what *is* a >> subheading, exactly? Is there any unambiguous definition? >> >> >> >> that's part of the issue I also think we are twisting ourselves in knots >> over an issue that is frankly less important than many of the other >> accessibility issues we could spend time working on. >> > > Let's go back to arguing over longdesc then :p > > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > ______________________________**______________________________**__ > re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively > [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] > > www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk > http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/**redux/<http://flickr.com/photos/redux/> > ______________________________**______________________________**__ > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > ______________________________**______________________________**__ > >
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 09:07:03 UTC