- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 22:07:06 +0100
- To: W3C WAI ig <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
On 14/12/2012 21:33, Karen Lewellen wrote: > How can you, not living my experience, decide my technology is backward? > smiles. > Or how can you decide anyone is using something backward if it works for > them? But it clearly doesn't work for you, if JavaScript enabled sites that work just fine for a large portion of disabled users who use more recent tools don't work well in your tools...no? Anyway, again: WCAG 2.0 allows accessibly-authored JavaScript. If the issue you're having is that you think this shouldn't be the case, then it's worth taking it up with the authors of WCAG 2.0 and see if this should get changed for WCAG 2.1 or whatever comes next. P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ ______________________________________________________________ twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke ______________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 14 December 2012 21:07:35 UTC