- From: Jan Eric Hellbusch <hellbusch@2bweb.de>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 08:21:25 +0100
- To: "'Roger Hudson'" <rhudson@usability.com.au>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Roger, > Many developers now remove the underline from links, and some change the > colour of links from the default blue. I know from my observations this can make > the pages harder for some people to use. > > I would be interested to know what impact other people think this might have on > complying with this Success Criteria: > > 1.4.1 Use of Color: Color is not used as the only visual means of conveying > information, indicating an action, prompting a response, or distinguishing a visual > element. I have seen pages where the link color was changed to red and where links are only distinguished bei mouse over and focus effects. I have also seen color blind people looking at that page and saying "No, there are no links on this page." The color red is probably a specific case, because some people with color blindness see red asblack or dark grey. But even people using contrast mode may have difficulties. Althouh there are all kinds of settings which can be made for links, links that are only shown in a different color may be overseen. So it is important to add at least one more visual cue (icon, underline, font weight ...) to the visual presentation of the link - specially when the links are a part of other text. That is how I understand 1.4.1. If links don't have at least one visual cue other than color, then the page fails conformance level A. HTH Jan -- Jan Eric Hellbusch Tel.: +49 (231) 86436760 oder +49 (163) 3369925 Web: http://2bweb.de Twitter: www.twitter.com/2bweb -- Das Buch über barrierefreies Webdesign: "Barrierefreiheit verstehen und umsetzen - Webstandards für ein zugängliches und nutzbares Internet" 812 Seiten, Dpunkt Verlag (2011) http://www.barrierefreies-webdesign.de/dpunkt/
Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 07:21:49 UTC