- From: <accessys@smart.net>
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 20:02:13 -0500 (EST)
- To: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net>
- cc: Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
one thing I use as a first check and obviously not perfect is to try to use the site with a legacy text browser such as LYNX. and run it on different platforms at least windows/apple/linux. this is a decent easy starting point and will certainly check things like alt text and css. Bob On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Karen Lewellen wrote: > Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 19:48:46 -0500 (EST) > From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net> > To: Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> > Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > Subject: Re: youtube accessibility > Resent-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 00:49:15 +0000 > Resent-From: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > > Very great question. I go additionally. which screen reader using which > platform under which circumstances? accessing what video type content? You > write as if " your two students represent the entire group of people with a > vision range starting at 20/200 down to the very smallest group 0/0..only 5% > of that population. > your test is great for two people, but this by no means indicates it works > for anyone else. > again I keep wondering why the focus is not more on very good test / > construction packages. Ways for site producers to create content, even video > content that can be used across the board..without them having to find a > token blind person and project that function onto an entire population, more > than likely leaving 95% of that group out in the first place. > Seriously though BASIC tools and utilities that inform someone what their > site is doing now, and how to fix it. how to create css environments so the > safer yet java script friendly browsers like links and elinks can still > function. etc. > With more and more smaller outfits doing their site and video work, they > need tools that make the rules well make sense. > not using jargon so to speak, but asking simple questions like, do you ant to > include some 25% or the population in your possible market? tone estimate of > those who could be using screen readers, with learning disabilities, not > sight loss. or substitute the members those over 40 who still have buying > power, but are using something else for maganification. > Karen > > On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Felix Miata wrote: > >> On 2012/03/01 12:18 (GMT) Gavin Thomas composed: >> >>> When I demoed the vision austrailia embedded example and the icant >>> accessible youtube player ( http://icant.co.uk/easy-youtube/) to 2 >>> blind >>> students in the university they were amazed they could search and play >>> videos. They said this was a great. >> >> That's fine for completely blind people dependent on screen readers. How >> does it help average over-40 vision people or those under 40 whose vision >> is less than average but better than dependence on a screen reader? >> -- >> "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant >> words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) >> >> Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! >> >> Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ >> >> >
Received on Saturday, 3 March 2012 01:02:44 UTC