- From: Ginger Claassen <ginger.claassen@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:47:35 +0100
- To: Terrill Bennett <list.w3c@spam-message.com>
- CC: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hi all, I do not now but I hav heard of varous websites where they have a tts feature for convinience with a nice voice. So it might be a nice goodie :-) Solong Ginger On 21.02.2012 15:46, Terrill Bennett wrote: > I have to ask... > > 1) If the user requires text-to-speech to understand your site, how did > the user GET to your web site in order to benefit from this technology? > ("Magic" is not an acceptable answer). > > 2) If the user requires text-to-speech to understand your site, and > since users spend most of their time on OTHER web sites... what do they > use when they leave your site? > > Answering these two questions will probably answer your original question. > > -- Terrill -- > > At 09:17 AM 2/21/2012, Régine Lambrecht wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> do you have references on how impaired users consider text-to-speech >> alternative, such as Readspeaker (http://www.readspeaker.com). >> >> Is it a good feature to add to a page that *is already accessible* ? >> Does it help impaired users or do they consider this negatively (maybe >> because you can’t skip paragraphs or easily read again words, for >> instance?) ? >> >> Thank you for your input >> >> >> >> *Régine Lambrecht >> *E-fficiency Coordinator >> Prevention Advisor
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 15:48:22 UTC