- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:36:06 +0000
- To: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
On 21/02/2012 15:24, Jonathan Hassell wrote: > Terrill, Patrick, > > Actually, the top use-case for site-specific tools is browsing on > multiple devices, especially mobile. Desktop/laptop OSes, ATs and > browsers can provide much of what people need. But go onto mobile and > those facilities are often not available. So, at best, an interim solution while mobile devices' own browsers (or third-party browsers) catch up? > So there are good reasons... > > Yes, the constraint is that these tools are site-specific at the moment. > But see GPII (http://gpii.net/) for a way around that particular issue > and a potential way of getting site-specific and locally hosted > accessibility aids to talk with each other. > > Over to you Gregg Vanderheiden... TL;DR is that the proxy-based approach that I remember Gregg telling me about a few years back? P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ ______________________________________________________________ twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke ______________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 15:36:45 UTC