Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:17:02 +0100
To: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FDBE151C8C378544A93886B9BA497069BB7AC28D20@tipik-mail>
Dear all, do you have references on how impaired users consider text-to-speech alternative, such as Readspeaker (http://www.readspeaker.com). Is it a good feature to add to a page that is already accessible ? Does it help impaired users or do they consider this negatively (maybe because you can't skip paragraphs or easily read again words, for instance?) ? Thank you for your input Régine Lambrecht E-fficiency Coordinator Prevention Advisor ________________________________________________ Tel. +32.2.235.56.62 <http://twitter.com/e_fficiency> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/reginelambrecht> www.tipik.eu<http://www.tipik.eu> Tipik Communication Agency S.A. Avenue de Tervueren 270 * B-1150 Bruxelles Tel. +32.2.235.56.70 * Fax +32.2.235.56.99 Tipik is a Sword Group Company P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
(image/png attachment: image001.png)
(image/png attachment: image002.png)