W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: UPDATE suggested alternatives to accessible version

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:32:24 +0000
Message-ID: <4F4026F8.3060905@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Carla wrote:

> http://www.hassellinclusion.com/2011/12/accessibility-myths-2011/

Were these examples of how not to write universal pages?

Dark green on grey in the tabs: almost zero colour contrast.

Light green on white in the body text, also a poor colour contrast, but 
not nearly as bad.

Large areas of white space on the first two screenfuls; I presume it 
only works in one browser.

Centre justification in the print version - at least they do have a 
print version and it doesn't go off the edge of the paper.
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Saturday, 18 February 2012 22:32:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:36:38 UTC