- From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 20:07:31 -0500 (EST)
- To: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Listers, I am sharing the below from a network administrator who works across several platforms. She asked that I share it, as I am not grounded enough in what she explains to comment. thoughts? > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 05:27:59 -0500 > From: Jude DaShiell <jdashiel@SHELLWORLD.NET> > Subject: section 508 flaw > > Revision control isn't in Section 508. This means that an information > product or utility covered by Section 508 once a complaint is processed > gets made compliant and then the information product or utility can be > modified by any number of updates which do not have to pass Section 508 > complince checks and requirements. That makes Section 508 in its current > form pointless. If a covered information product or utility within the > Section 508 complaint process is put under Section 508 revision control > and then sent out as a software or web page release, this loophole would > then be closed. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- Jude > <jdashiel-at-shellworld-dot-net> > <http://www.shellworld.net/~jdashiel/nj.html> > > >
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 01:07:58 UTC