- From: Richard Warren <richard@userite.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:03:30 -0000
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Andrew & Jon, Under the old guidleines (V1) there was just a level 3 guideline about distinguising between links - 10.5 Until user agents render adjacent links distinctly, include no-link, printable characters between adjacent links. Otherwise there was nothing about a "minimum clickable area". I think that, as Andrew suggests, it is a usability issue that affects all sighted users that are able to use a mouse. This is one of those issues where a blind user, or anyone who uses the keyboard for navigation, actually has an advantage. <G> Richard Technical Manager Userite http://www.userite.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Kirkpatrick" <akirkpat@adobe.com> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 12:28 PM Subject: RE: Size of a clickable area and the WCAG 2 guidelines Jon, I don't believe that this is covered by WCAG 2.0 - I can't speak for the working group but as a member of it I think that the question is how far this issue is along the slippery slope between being an issue that differentially affects people with disabilities and being a usability issue that impacts users irrespective of disability. I'm not sure of the answer to that, but it is surely not only affecting people with disabilities, so that may have been the basis for it not being included. Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Senior Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe Systems akirkpat@adobe.com http://twitter.com/awkawk http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility On 2/23/10 5:28 PM, Jonathan Avila wrote: > Perhaps I missed something but I cannot locate anything in WCAG 2 > requiring a minimum clickable area for clickable items such as links or > a minimum amount of space between clickable items. These accessibility > best practices seem like more than usability requirements for people > with mobility impairments and surely should at least be level AAA > guidelines. Can anyone point me to a mapping into WCAG 2 for these? > > Jonathan >
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 13:03:35 UTC