- From: Thierry Koblentz <ng@tjkdesign.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:22:34 -0700
- To: "'Roger Hudson'" <rhudson@usability.com.au>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <042a01cb0aa7$ab7e04d0$027a0e70$@com>
There was an article posted recently about this very issue (high-contrast): http://www.artzstudio.com/2010/04/img-sprites-high-contrast/ The original technique is explained here (it mentions other accessibility/usability issues): http://tjkdesign.com/articles/tip.asp The only problem I see with this method is that the sprite does not belong to the styles sheet but is embedded into the HTML. If there is no versioning of the image then it's not a problem, but if there is versioning then it means authors have to edit many documents (unless they keep the file path as a variable). Two other advantages of this technique: 1. it does *not* rely on negative text-indent so when images are not available the text is visible within the viewport. 2. When users highlight content (i.e., ctrl + A or cmd + A) images (*unlike* background images) appears as selected. -- Regards, Thierry www.tjkdesign.com | <http://www.ez-css.org> www.ez-css.org | @thierrykoblentz From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Roger Hudson Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 7:36 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: high contrast and background images Hi I have come across and interesting problem with background images. Some sites use a background (CSS) image for the main banner at the top and this sometimes contains navigation items. When you select the High Contrast option with Windows XP and Windows 7 it appears that background images are not displayed with Internet Explorer or Firefox, but are displayed with Opera. Love other opinions about how this stands accessibility-wise. Roger Roger Hudson Web Usability Email: <mailto:rhudson@usability.com.au> rhudson@usability.com.au Web: <http://www.usability.com.au/> www.usability.com.au Blog: www.dingoaccess.com
Received on Sunday, 13 June 2010 03:23:02 UTC