- From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:48:36 -0800
- To: WAI Interest Group list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5076E68FCD2E91428C2479984A81E1147B5CB6F03C@NAMBX01.corp.adobe.com>
I'd disagree with that statement - http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20081211/G141.html indicates that authors _should_ follow the structure you indicate, but nothing that says that they _must_. "Should" indicates that it is generally regarded as important, but if you are evaluating a site for WCAG 2.0 there is nothing in the recommendation that says that a page with three H1's would fail, provided that the page structure corresponds to that. Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Senior Product Manager, Accessibility Adobe Systems akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpatrick@adobe.com> From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Andy Laws Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 11:22 AM To: WAI Interest Group list Subject: More than one h1 tag Dear All in the event of a page having more than 1 h1 tag can i confirm that this breaks guidling 1.3.1 of WCAG 2.0 as this not a meaningful sequence Reagrds Andy -- Andrew Laws Bsc(Hons) MBCS, FBCS Web-Sites: www.opelnet.co.uk<http://www.opelnet.co.uk> www.cubiks.com<http://www.cubiks.com> www.holidayhypermarket.co.uk<http://www.holidayhypermarket.co.uk> e-mail: adlaws@gmail.com<mailto:adlaws@gmail.com> Telephone:: +44 (0) 7828822987
Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 00:49:20 UTC