- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:25:22 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Michael S Elledge wrote: > representative set of skill levels. In most cases that will include > novices as well as more expert users of adaptive technology. We collect I don't think he was particularly talking about adaptive technology users. I think he was talking about people who don't belong to the computer using generation, and maybe also young people with cognitive disabilities. As well as physical disabilities age, in particular, brings a difficulty in learning new technology, a fear of breaking things, and a lack of prior experience of that technology. > > Perhaps I've missed your point, but I think the key is not to determine > which level of competence is necessary for people to use websites built > to WCAG 2.0 guidelines, but to identify which implementations of those > guidelines work best for persons with disabilities. I'd agree that, for web sites designed for accessibility, the need for education is a negative quality indicator. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Tuesday, 3 November 2009 21:25:57 UTC