- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:15:27 -0500
- To: Ramón Corominas <listas@ramoncorominas.com>
- Cc: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2009 18:16:22 UTC
this is correct. The uses of the technology must be accessibility supported for it to conform. Gregg ----------------------- Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D. Director Trace R&D Center Professor Ind and Biomed Engr University of Wisconsin-Madison On Mar 31, 2009, at 2:54 AM, Ramón Corominas wrote: > If I understand your answer, it doesn't matter for compliance if > there is assistive technology that is able to interpret that > content. So the content can comply, but nobody can access it? If > there is no screen reader capable to consistently render the > content, it can not be considered compliant, I think.
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2009 18:16:22 UTC