- From: Mag Leahy <magleahy@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:47:41 +0100
- To: "David Dorward" <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Cc: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <a25bda170810070647j6aa8e8c5wd6a959403e8b62b1@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Patti and David, For me I started developing with table-less layout in 2003 but I had been out of the industry for the previous 2 years. In 1999-2001 it has been table hell. =) >From an accessibility point of view tables should be marked up well for tabular data and should NOT be used for layout. http://www.webaim.org/techniques/tables/data.php Cheers. On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:37 PM, David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk> wrote: > > Patti Burke-Lund wrote: > > > > I was wondering if anyone could share their insight with regard to > > layout tables and accessibility, as well as when the switch occurred > > from layout tables to CSS (i.e., how many years this has been a > > recommended practice). Any thoughts are greatly appreciated, as they > > will be added to our class discussion board with proper credit given > > as "guest speakers." > > > The classic document on the subject for managers appears to have cropped > up in late 2003 ... > > http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.hotdesign.com/seybold/ > > I'd assume that would be a few years after web developers at the > standards end of the curve started to pick up on them, which corresponds > to when I vaguely remember making the switch (although I was a hobbiest > at the time). > > So I'd say its been recommended and practical since around the turn of > the century. > > -- > David Dorward > http://dorward.me.uk/ > > > -- Mag!
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2008 13:48:16 UTC