- From: Ryan Jean <ryanj@disnetwork.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:23:56 -0400
- To: "'Phill Jenkins'" <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <E1KYiRs-0004jQ-Hy@bart.w3.org>
Good points. Is there anyone specifically in charge of alternative formats, not just web accessibility? Such as W3C has standards for web accessibility. Sincerely, Ryan Jean Assistant IT Specialist The Disability Network Flint, MI _____ From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Phill Jenkins Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 10:04 AM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: RE: Alternative Formats > . . . I was referring to all formats, such as visual, audio, and written. I do see where all 3 > of these would fall into web accessibility. Visual for graphics, audio for sound, and > written for downloading files as PDF or TXT. Do you agree? Well, I would expand your simple list to also include the following, quoted from Understand WCAG: * Controls, Input: If non-text content is a control or accepts user input, then it has a <http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/text-equiv-all.html#namedef> name that describes its purpose. (Refer to <http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/ensure-compat.html> Guideline 4.1 for additional requirements for controls and content that accepts user input.) * Time-Based Media: If non-text content is time-based media, then text alternatives at least provide descriptive identification of the non-text content. (Refer to <http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/media-equiv.html> Guideline 1.2 for additional requirements for media.) * Test: If non-text content is a test or exercise that <http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/text-equiv-all.html#must-nontextd ef> must be presented in non-text format, then text alternatives at least provide descriptive identification of the non-text content. * Sensory: If non-text content is primarily intended to create a <http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/text-equiv-all.html#sensoryexpdef > specific sensory experience, then text alternatives at least provide descriptive identification of the non-text content. * <http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/text-equiv-all.html#CAPTCHAdef> CAPTCHA: If the purpose non-text content is to confirm that content is being accessed by a person rather than a computer, then text alternatives that identify and describe the purpose of the non-text content are provided, and alternative forms of CAPTCHA using output modes for different types of sensory perception are provided to accommodate different disabilities. * Decoration, Formatting, Invisible: If non-text content is <http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/text-equiv-all.html#puredecdef> pure decoration, is used only for visual formatting, or is not presented to users, then it is implemented in a way that it can be ignored by <http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/text-equiv-all.html#atdef> assistive technology. Regards, Phill Jenkins IBM Research - Human Ability & Accessibility Center http://www.ibm.com/able
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2008 14:26:17 UTC