- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 22:15:57 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
David Dorward wrote: > > > Most of the accessibility issues relating to it are caused by the way > programs written in JS manipulate the DOM (which is a set of W3C I would argue that most of the problems lie in the manipulation of the browser object model, which has never been standardised by W3C (although the HTML5 people may be doing it). > recommendations), and work is already underway to improve things there W3C has never standardised things like document.write on the current document, and I don't believe it has standardised InnerHTML. A lot of what it has standardised is rejected by the market in favour of the aforementioned constructs. (W3C's model does permit document.write, but only where a complete document is produced, not for load time interpolation of content.) -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Monday, 18 August 2008 21:15:13 UTC