- From: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:52:02 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF76E09BAD.DA33EE56-ON862574A9.0059A563-862574A9.005CA7CE@us.ibm.com>
> document.write() > . . . How about Model-View-Controller with Controller in > JS? . . . "view components" may make up an entire ui > whereby only one bit may change. This would be a challenge > for a screen reader, I'd think, because you'd have to restart > reading of the screen if text that's already been read changes. That is exactly one of the potential issues. Upon the document.write() event, the DOM is reloaded and the screen reader starts reading back at the top on the document. There is no old API or way for the screen reader to know just what part was changed without taking a performance hit and trying to guess with heuristics. The other issue is events - and who causes them. If the document.write occurs as a result of the user selecting a link or some other user controlled event, then it can be explained to the user what will happen and how to "handle it". But if some random event cause the page to reload, for example some push advertising re-loads the image for the advertisement, then the users has no warning or control to stop or pause that - a big accessibility issue. Hence the invention of ARIA - Accessible Rich Internet Application spec that allows not only the specification of the "U I components, but also the asynchronous updating of them without having to do a whole document.write thing. But developers still have to understand and give the end user control over events, such as clicking on links, selecting from controls, etc. such that if the users does nothing, nothing changes out from under him. See also http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/#keyboard-operation Regards, Phill Jenkins IBM Research - Human Ability & Accessibility Center http://www.ibm.com/able
Received on Monday, 18 August 2008 16:52:51 UTC