- From: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@ncbi.ie>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:47:04 +0000
- To: christopher.a.hoffman@gmail.com
- Cc: "Robison, Cole [EISU]" <Cole.Robison@da.ks.gov>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Chris Hoffman wrote: > And if the @headers attribute is lost to the ashes of HTML4? Then I say > that , where we have to, we continue using it anyway. AT and even > browser vendors have a long history of embracing the actual practices of > the Web when the standards do not. > If we use the @headers attributes, then the attributes will be used. Amen to that. There are support issues for older user of AT also (or rather users of older AT, who may happen to be well older..) basically of support for @scope. @header/combinations also suffice for _many_ data table requirements. I also hope the @summary attribute also hangs in there. In my experience it is a really useful attribute that helps a blind user very quickly understand what a complex data table is for. Its appalling to see it dropped, rubbed out, deprecated whatever.. Josh ******************************************************************** NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system. NCBI endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of NCBI ********************************************************************
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2008 11:47:40 UTC