> > > > David Woolley wrote: > > > > It seems to me to be a major defeat, as it means that no US e-business > > need have an accessible web site, as long as they refrain from operating > > physical retail outlets. Yet another perceived cost in physical retail > > that is avoided by going online only. > > > Actually, I don't think that was an issue that was addressed by the > case. That will likely come in another lawsuit challenging a purely What was quoted here was that the pure online part of the site was excluded from the ruling and allowed to remain faulty. > online retailer and the need for accessibility.Received on Friday, 8 September 2006 23:00:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:36:28 UTC