- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:08:07 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
David Woolley wrote: > In XHTML 2.0, you can replace the a element by a sup element, so I > wouldn't abandon it that soon. It is borderline presentational; > there are other uses of sup that I would argue are less presentational, > as they form universal conventions in mathematics, chemistry, etc. ...and there's the related discussion on the W3C HTML mailing list about sub/sup, which splintered off from that about samp,kbd,var http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2006Aug/0149.html -- Patrick H. Lauke __________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __________________________________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 29 August 2006 07:08:37 UTC