- From: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:40:03 -0400
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I generally support the view, " code to the standard, not to the screen reader,". But how do you reconcile this to the S508 para (l0 mandate, "... the information provided by the script shall be identified with functional text that can be read by assistive technology" ? Ability to use the application with At is the final test in this case, is it not? Also even many sighted users may be looking at the keyboard as they type and not realize that AJAX has refreshed a part of the screen. Accessibility issues with DHTML and AJAX are summarized in the Road-map doc from PFWG http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/roadmap/DHTMLRoadmap040506.html Refer: http://www.fcw.com/article95257-07-17-06-Print&printLayout Sailesh Panchang Senior Accessibility Engineer Deque Systems Inc. (www.deque.com) 11180 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite #400, Reston VA 20191 Phone: 703-225-0380 (ext 105) E-mail: sailesh.panchang@deque.com -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bailey, Bruce Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 9:07 AM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Can AJAX find harmony on agency Web sites? I think the article contains some unsupported inflammatory assertions, not the least of which is byline! I am hoping the author might get a note about how WCAG 1.0 and especially the draft 2.0 provide for changes in dynamic content. Can AJAX find harmony on agency Web sites? Hot coding technique unable to hit fed Web pages because of accessibility questions. http://www.fcw.com/article95257-07-17-06-Print&printLayout Wade-Hahn Chan, Federal Computer Week, 17 July 2006.
Received on Monday, 17 July 2006 15:33:56 UTC