- From: David Clark <david.clark@umb.edu>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:35:55 -0400
- To: "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hey Bruce, I love this line from the developer docs: "The Bindows framework now includes support for accessibility (US Government Section-508 requirements) in Internet Explorer for visually impaired users." If the statement requires those two provisos, is it really a solution? On 7/17/06, Bailey, Bruce <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov> wrote: > > I think the article contains some unsupported inflammatory assertions, not the least of which is byline! I am hoping the author might get a note about how WCAG 1.0 and especially the draft 2.0 provide for changes in dynamic content. > > Can AJAX find harmony on agency Web sites? > Hot coding technique unable to hit fed Web pages because of accessibility questions. > http://www.fcw.com/article95257-07-17-06-Print&printLayout > Wade-Hahn Chan, Federal Computer Week, 17 July 2006. > > -- dc ----- David Clark Web Specialist Institute for Community Inclusion (http://www.communityinclusion.org/) david.clark@umb.edu (617) 287-4318
Received on Monday, 17 July 2006 13:36:08 UTC