- From: Colin Lieberman <clieberman@dralegal.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:43:51 -0800
- To: "'Paul Novitski'" <paul@juniperwebcraft.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Paul - Without commenting on the merits of your scheme, I would suggest you reconsider how you are describing it. "Linked List" is a fairly specific sort of construction in Computer Science, (which you can read about here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linked_list) that specifically refers to chained data types. Colin Lieberman IT Manager Disability Rights Advocates 2001 Center Street, Third Floor Berkeley, California 94704-1204 510 665 8644 x.134 (Tel) 510 665 8716 (TTY) 510 665 8511 (Fax) -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Paul Novitski Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 11:34 AM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: linked list alternative to nested menus I'm contemplating an alternative to the usual nested-list nav menu structure and solicit your opinions. First, here's a standard nested menu. Opinions vary as to whether it's kosher to include all the sub-menus nested inside the parent and conceal the inactive sub-menus from visual users. I've included all the sub-menus in this markup for the sake of illustration: <h3>Navigation</h3> <ul> <li><a href="home.php">Home</a></li> <li><a href="products.php">Products</a> <ul> <li><a href="widgets.php">Widgets</a> <li><a href="whatsits.php">Whatsits</a> <li><a href="thingummies.php">Thingummies</a> </ul> </li> <li><a href="philosophies.php">Philosophies</a> <ul> <li><a href="tao.php">Tao</a> <li><a href="zen.php">Zen</a> </ul> </li> </ul> This makes semantic sense but could wear on your patience if you're hearing the page through a screen-reader. If you activate a link in the parent menu and bring up a new page that again contains the navigation menu, how do you know that a sub-menu exists inside the parent item? Do you have to listen through all the menu options you've already heard in order to discover and hear the new sub-menu? As an alternative, I'm considering a series of linked lists instead of one complex nested list. In the following example, the Products and Philosophies sub-menus appear after, not nested inside, the top-level menu. The Products and Philosophies items in the top-level menu now contain URI fragment identifiers (same-page anchors) linking to their sub-menus farther down the page. If you've navigated to the Products home page, I'd also add a skip link to the Products sub-menu so you wouldn't be forced to hear the top-level nav menu again: <p><a href="#products">Skip to Products</a></p> <h3>Navigation</h3> <ul> <li><a href="home.php">Home</a></li> <li><a href="#products">Products</a></li> <li><a href="#philosophies">Philosophies</a></li> </ul> <div id="products"> <h3>Products</h3> <ul> <li><a href="widgets.php">Widgets</a> <li><a href="whatsits.php">Whatsits</a> <li><a href="thingummies.php">Thingummies</a> </ul> </div> <div id="philosophies"> <h3>Philosophies</h3> <ul> <li><a href="tao.php">Tao</a> <li><a href="zen.php">Zen</a> </ul> </div> Advantages: 1) faster & easier for non-visual users to navigate (I hope). 2) lends itself easily to visual layouts in which the sub-menu lies in a column or row adjacent to the parent menu. 3) sub-menus can be displayed or concealed for visual users in the same ways as nested sub-menus are. Disadvantages: 1) The semantic relationship of parent menu item to sub-menu is obscured if not lost. 2) Because the sub-menu is not structurally nested within the parent item, some visual layouts of the menu will be difficult or impossible, such as the nested folder metaphor. Your comments? Paul
Received on Friday, 10 March 2006 20:19:01 UTC