- From: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:12:12 -0600
- To: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF4B2BBC0F.FFE42565-ON8625712A.007D58EC-8625712A.007F75FA@us.ibm.com>
Isofarro <lists@isofarro.uklinux.net> wrote: > The fundamentals of a dynamically generated text-only website are wrong, > and the end result is no better than the start result, and typically is > worse. Can someone please explain to me the difference between having the server dynamically produce the text only web page and the results of browsing the page with the text only browser, such as Lynx? Isn't this just really a "when" and "who" statement or functionality? Putting the assistive technology on the server can actually provide some assistive functionality to the users who don't have the assistive technology on their client. So the benefit and usefulness is dependent on the paradigm of who's client and when they are getting the content, before or after server transformation. For example, the real difference between the LIFT transcoder and the text only browser such as Lynx is in the assistive functionality between the two. If LIFT has more capabilities that Lynx, then the Lynx user is at a disadvantage if they don't use the LIFT dynamically generated page - simple as that. If the assistive capabilities of Jaws or Windows Eyes or ZoomText are greater that the LIFT server capabilities, which I will argue they are, there is actually a disadvantage to the Jaws/WindowEyes/ZoomText/AT user to use the LIFT transcoded page instead of the non-transcoded page. So, is there anything wrong for a company to offer a dynamically text generated page - not in my mind. In fact, it may offers functionality to users who don't have the functionality on their client. But, let's not confuse the difference between what can be done on a server vs what can be done on a client. A server side assistive technology transcoder will never, in my opinion, replace or duplicate the functionality of the client side AT such as Jaws or ZoomText, but it sure can be helpful to clients who don't have either.. Regards, Phill Jenkins IBM Worldwide Accessibility Center http://www.ibm.com/able
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2006 23:12:19 UTC