- From: David Clark <david@davidsaccess.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 13:21:53 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
I for one, find this completelely ironic, and an incdication of how little the comments of the wider WAI-G really matter. Look thru the archives -- all the way back to 1999, and you will ssee frustration with the misperception of "Bobby Approval" and how its false positives were doing a disserce to the adoption of real accessibility. Newer, more modern applications entered the arena, with far better ways of representing the issues. Yeet, as being the first (and only) tool for approximately 3 years, Bobby had the name recognition (arguably more than WAI) and was looked to as the standard. Rather than rising to the call, and evolving Bobby to be the best it could be, no work has been done on it for 7+ years, yet it continues to be the go-to for people who only have tangential khowledge of the issues. How does this all relate to the announcement of Mr. Cooper you ask? The decline of Bobby is directly correlated with Mr. Cooper's involvement. He has been "in charge" of\ Bobby both at CAST and Watchfire, and has failed to shepherd the evolvement of the product in ainy shape oor form. The WAI deserves, and can find, much botter.
Received on Saturday, 24 June 2006 17:21:57 UTC