- From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:03:29 +0100 (CET)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 17 Feb, david poehlman wrote: > reader users. Skip Nav is a retro fit technique and as such, is some > times necessary but it should be done correctly if it is done at all. > If you are designing a new site though, it should not be necessary But why *not*? Personally - bein' as I am fully sighted - I find "skip to content" (when navigation is listed first) or even "skip to navigation" (when navigation is listed last) *very* useful mechanisms to have. My UA, after all, can't know where I want to go today. > and especially should not be copyrighted for screen readers in any > event because as has been pointed out by others than my self, blind It shouldn't be copywrited period - there are far too many languages and ways of writing things for any group to start dictating content. -- - Tina Holmboe Greytower Technologies tina@greytower.net http://www.greytower.net/ [+46] 0708 557 905
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2005 16:03:31 UTC