- From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:45:03 +0100 (CET)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 17 Feb, Bailey, Bruce wrote: >> My example was using 2.8.5rel7 - did you try increasing the >> window size, or decreasing the font size? > > That made all the difference for me. Initially my results were like > Adams's. With a wide enough display, my experience was more like > Tina's. I suspected as much. Lynx, for all its virtues (it is STILL my favourite browser) is limited in - in this context - how it can render a table. On occasion, to get columsn to line up properly, a much wider screen than expected is needed. (alt. a smaller font, like the one I used in my example) > FYI the (current) end of the thread at the Blinux List can be found at > URL: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/blinux-list/2005-February/msg00063.html Hm. Yes. I'm afraid I can't quite agree with them. Lynx is still under development, and it does actually support quite a bit of HTML 4; up until a few years ago it supported *more* so than Mozilla and Opera; IE has still not caught on to things like LINK-based navigation. But yes, certainly, Lynx *do* have limitations in its table support. No surprise, really. -- - Tina Holmboe Greytower Technologies tina@greytower.net http://www.greytower.net/ [+46] 0708 557 905
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2005 15:45:05 UTC