- From: <Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:27:10 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I sent these comments out earlier today, but it appears that they did not make it to the general list. I apologize if this winds up being a double post. Comments below are mine and may not represent the opinions of the corporation I work for. My points are rather simple. More equals more cost. Testing is a part of this cost. The cost of testing is not massive nor is it small enough to avoid consideration. Accessible for all is an extreme rarely achieved on the Internet. Accessible for some means some will still be excluded. Accessible for some is better than accessible for none. Accessible is not limited to users with disabilities. For large sites cost benefit analysis is a significant part of the decision process to define who the some(excluded and or included) are. Over the past few years American banking sites have begun to include users with disabilities in the definition of some. None has become some, progress has been made. With no acknowledgement of the progress, this discussion seems to imply American banking sites are generally not accessible. More is sought. More needs to be done. More equals more cost. Regarding a separate comment... Throw in the towel? Not as long as I work in this industry! I consider the progress made by American banking sites the beginning of a success story with many chapters yet to be written. Yes more does need to be done, but let us not fail to acknowledge what has been accomplished and accurately represent the costs incurred while asking for more. Kurt Mattes ********************************************************************** This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you **********************************************************************
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2005 19:27:45 UTC