RE: accessible banking:

All,
To be very honest any bank that says they are making people use IE for
security issues does not know anything about what they are talking about.  I
can put you in touch with people who can make a pretty good case that IE has
major issues.

Contact me off list if you want information on this.  I have spent many
hours working these issues, I know what I am talking about.

Please do not let anyone tell you IE is highly secure, it has a myriad of
security issues associated with it.
Sincerely,

Mike Burks

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Lainey Feingold
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 10:11 PM
To: Kelly Pierce; david poehlman; wai-ig list
Subject: Re: accessible banking:



I think this issue is about on-line banking requiring the user to use 
Internet Explorer and not other browsers.  (The do that for what they say 
are security issues.)  I know some blind community reps have talked to the 
B of A web folks about this in the past.  If anyone wants me to put them in 
touch with our contacts -- who have been very supportive, let me 
know.  Other banks with whom I have settlement agreements (and web 
contacts) are Bank One/Chase; First Union/Wachovia; Sovereign; Citizens 
Bank and Union Bank of California.  Wells Fargo does not have a web 
accessibility agreement, but has done good work on the web site and has NFB 
certification for some of it, so we have contacts there too.

Lainey



At 06:38 PM 1/31/2005, Kelly Pierce wrote:
>David,
>
>Are you saying that the Bank of America does not comply with priorities 
>One and two of the Web Content Accessibility guidelines, version 1.0?  A 
>few years ago it entered into a legal settlement agreeing to fully comply 
>with WCAG.  either it isn't doing so or the guidelines are 
>inadequate.  Another bank in the mid-Atlantic area where you live that 
>entered into a similar agreement was Wachovia.
>
>I have had little contact with Bank of America.  I live in the only region 
>of the country (the upper Midwest) that the bank hasn't fully entered.  in 
>the last year, they have opened up a few branches here in Chicago but 
>these don't have talking ATM's.  It's ironic considering that the bank has 
>several thousand people based in Chicago, including a number of web
developers.
>
>Kelly
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "david poehlman" 
><david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
>To: "wai-ig list" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
>Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 9:57 AM
>Subject: accessible banking:
>
>
>>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>I'm looking for a bank that does not require ie to do busines.  I
currently
>>do business with bank of america and suntrust banks.  I need a bank I can
>>walk to from time to time although that is less of a requrement than
online
>>banking.  The monopoly that is held by ie in matters of this type needs to
>>be broken.  I am finding merchants that will do business with me no matter
>>what user agent I use.  I know this is not a requirement of any <law> but
it
>>is a requirement for my accessibility needs and will be a growing
>>requirement for others as well.
>>
>>Thanks for any help.
>>
>>Johnnie Apple Seed
>>
>>
>



Lainey Feingold
Law Office of Elaine B. Feingold
1524 Scenic Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94708
(510) 548.5062
mailto:lfeingold1@earthlink.net


The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, 
confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended 
recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly 
prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in 
error, please e-mail the sender at lfeingold1@earthlink.net and delete it 
permanently from your computer files.  Thank you.

Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2005 03:25:32 UTC