- From: Vicente Luque Centeno <vlc@it.uc3m.es>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 19:07:51 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On Sat, 28 May 2005, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > Hi Vicente, this is interesting work. I think that you have misinterpreted > some of the WCAG - for example "No abbreviation or acronym should be defined > more than once" is not what the relevant checkpoint means. I know. The "uniqueness" property is only a part of what should be checked. It is not the full condition (which requires human judgement). It is only a subcondition that, at least, can be checked automatically. > Unfortunately (from my perspective) the WCAG group has not been very open to > helping clarify how the WCAG should be interpreted. I hope that this will > change somewhat, as work like yours starts to make it important. Let's cross our fingers ;-) > You should consider announcing it to the Evaluation and Repair Tools working > group. I have tried, but suscription will last several days. I saw that you forwarded it, but most of my message was missing. Cheers.
Received on Saturday, 28 May 2005 17:07:56 UTC