- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:19:07 +0000 (GMT)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> > Again, there are unwarranted assumptions here. First, that they are > actually using a Windows version that allows easy switching between > different users All versions likely to be used by a naive user do. > (and especially that they are using XP); and secondly that I was only assuming XP in relation to a feature that I said was not in the Home Edition, and to note that language selection was more in depth than the level that you were discussing. However, I would suggest that, at the moment, the reasonable assumption when answering a question where the user doesn't specify the operating system is to assume XP Home, or in the UK at least, a turnkey system based on a pre-configured XP Home. > they even know they _can_ set up different users, each with their own > configuration. However, I do have real problems on this issue as I am a believer in the broad definition of accessibility (some prominent posters on this list insist that accessibility only applies to the legally disabled and designers may take what liberties with people considered normal (even if poor, etc.)) In this particular case, the best resolution would seem to me to be for the browser not to send Accept Language if there is no dominant language in a country and to send the dominant language of the region in which it was sold, otherwise. Multi-lingual pages should then provide an override mechanism. You are not going to produce a browser that makes it easy for every user to find every option that might benefit them, without making a effort to look for them. And, unfortunately, most users want instant gratification, so don't even read the getting started documentation. (The problem with broad definition accessibility is that it unattractive to businesses as it results, in their perception, in expenditure on segments of the market that will not produce additional sales to more than compensate for the expenditure, or will be less profitable than creating a new product for the easy part of the market.)
Received on Thursday, 25 March 2004 16:32:24 UTC