- From: Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@mail.tele.dk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 08:23:48 +0100
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
An URL to a web page should be a uniform resource locator serving the same content to all people, what is served should not depend on the browser or user agent people use. It is bad practice to use the HTTP Accept-Language header as a code fork for what an URL should mean. Cheers Jesper Tverskov David Woolley wrote: The main disadvantages (assuming a client mediated redirect, so that at least the bulk of the page is cachable) are: - it is difficult to make an offline copy of a site; - it is difficult to look at the text in a different language than your own (and remember that many more browsers think that US English is the user's only language than there are users with that as their first language); - a user bookmarking a page in preparation to link to it will end up with the language specific page, not the language negotiating version. Jesper Tverskov wrote: I am not sure that language detection is a good thing. When I use an English browser (I do) I want a French web site, a Russian website, etc. to be in the original language when arriving. Then I can change language if I need to. If I am in Spain and start looking at Danish web sites in some local browser, I would hate if they were suddenly not in Danish.
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2004 02:16:06 UTC