- From: John Foliot - WATS.ca <foliot@wats.ca>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:25:29 -0400
- To: <Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> > The W3C's WCAG states: > > Priority 2 - 3.1 "When an appropriate markup language > exists, use markup rather than images to convey information." > > It can't be clearer than that. You keep asking how, many keep suggesting > don't. Whoo Hoo!! While this may not solve all of your problems, Stewart Rosenberger recently posted an article at A List Apart (http://www.alistapart.com/articles/dynatext/) which may provide something of a partial solution to Kurt's dilemma. I have only just glanced at this article, but by all accounts it appears that a design hurdle may have been significantly addressed here. Normally I advocate *NOT* using Client Side script except for non-critical "eye-candy"; this I feel falls into that category, as fully implemented it is backwards compatible and does not "break" when client side scripting is not available. I plan on playing around with this some more but at first glance this technique appears to support Standards Compliant, Accessible and yet Aesthetically pleasing development. Thanks Stewart! > But forward thinking professionals will seek instead to push the > envelope, to try and deliver the pizzazz and punch that many have come to > expect but will do so in accessible ways. They will think outside of the > box, try new ideas, fight for a better way, push, prod and plead. The > choice is there for all... (Hey, didn't I just say that?) Cheers! JF -- John Foliot foliot@wats.ca Web Accessibility Specialist / Co-founder of WATS.ca Web Accessibility Testing and Services http://www.wats.ca 1.866.932.4878 (North America)
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2004 15:25:32 UTC