RE: Bobby user checks

• From: Jewett, Jim J <jim.jewett@eds.com>
• Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 12:59:10 -0400
• To: "'Scarlett Julian'" <Julian.Scarlett@sheffield.gov.uk>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
• Message-ID: <B8CDFB11BB44D411B8E600508BDF076C1E96D48A@USAHM010.amer.corp.eds.com>

> My worry is that those developers (who should know
> better but apparently don't) that run Bobby to assess
> the accessibility of their developments are ignoring
> the user checks, one of which refers to the need to
> validate to a published formal grammar.

So the real issue is default interface.

Could the bobby default to also running the w3c validator?

-jJ

Received on Wednesday, 21 April 2004 13:01:51 UTC